| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Another quality thread brought by SFKFK.
In b4 the lock. This is a legitimate treatment of how AFK mining devalues the whole profession of mining. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Your knowledge of economics is impressive to a human being, I'll grant you that.
AFK mining lasers and bots don't care how impressive your mention of motivation theory is, though.
AFK mining lasers and bots aren't motivated by anything. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't.
Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malphilos wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't. Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve. For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard. That'd be fine..
People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely.
When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value suffers. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too.
Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner.
Thanks for the great question. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power.
Of course you're making money, I acknowledged that. I am not that much of a miner (I trade) but in any case, trading while mining justifies the electricity. Watching a video while mining => the computer uses like 5 more watts out of 700 it's using anyway so.... who cares for those 5W? Darth Gustav wrote: Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE. Make it less craptastic of a mechanic and you'll magically see people willing to actually play it. You mean as opposed to now, where tons of people are playing it "AFK" or by "macro"?
You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Malphilos wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Malphilos wrote:
For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard.
That'd be fine.. People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely. When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value sufferes. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too. Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner. Thanks for the great question. You're welcome! I have more: When they're sitting at their keyboard, does it matter where their eyes are pointing? What if they're at the keyboard but asleep? How do wireless keyboards fit into this scheme? What's the impact of running EVE and Firefly on the same display? While sleeping? In what units are you measuring effort (as in "zero effort")? Only the last question deserves any answer.
Effort is described in terms of work, or force divided by distance, to achieve it.
In this case I'm going to use Joules (J) for the unit. Nevertheless, a zero value here is equal to a zero value for any other unit of work I'm familiar with.
I hope that helps. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. that situation only becomes reality when ice, and all of it's refined products are worth exactly 0 isk on the market. that will never happen, hence there will always be afk ice miners. Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms.
Having not looked at the changes in ice prices lately, I'd have to ask is this happening? Are we really approaching 0 at any appreciable rate to be concerned or is the argument more academic than realistic in nature at this point? They have fallen a long way, one could say we're approaching some low number.
Whether the math says that low number is zero or not is any player's guess, I think.
But there's no doubt we're approaching a very low number based on trends. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. Well, at some point the AFKers will devalue the resource to the point where Darth Gustav and Suddenly Forums ForumKing will either stop participating in the activity, or resort to the traditional carebear response of complaining on the forums and hoping CCP will "fix" it. Given the last thing CCP did to "fix" mining (the introduction of the ridiculously tanked barges), I don't expect anything to be seriously done about mining in the future. I've written a blog post about my ideal changes to mining that will still allow the AFKers to ply their trade while rewarding active players. You have absolutely no idea who I am or what I stand for, do you?
So should I take the time to read your blog, or should you take the time to read at least one of my posts or threads?
Because I'm not doing any carebearing. Sorry. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:So should I take the time to read your blog, or should you take the time to read at least one of my posts or threads?
Because I'm not doing any carebearing. Sorry. You are posting in a mining thread. Even more, you are in a mining thread discussing the income of AFK ice harvesting.  I would humbly suggest that you are actively engaged in the most carebear of carebear activities. You'd be wrong as wrong can be.
I am a null zealot part-time ganker, part-time bumper who genuinely believes that the risk I add to the game provides value-added content to miners for their benefit as well as my enjoyment.
The fact that what I do is a public service to successful miners because their wares bring more value at market as a result of my actions is all the thanks I need. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1708
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:I am a null zealot part-time ganker, part-time bumper who genuinely believes that the risk I add to the game provides value-added content to successful miners for their benefit as well as my enjoyment. You are correct. But you are still posting in a thread about ice harvesting income! Yup.
Because I have a valid opinion about it due to my non-mining pursuits. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1712
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Cool, I've studied business studies, economics and politics and on my management and motivation module i got 97% on the exam. Let's look at a really basic motivation model shall we? Quote:Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 1. Physiological needsThe definition of physiological needs is quite obvious; they are the physical requirements for human survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body cannot function properly, and will ultimately fail. Physiological needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met first. Therefore, a human lacking food, love, esteem, or safety would consider the greatest of his/her needs to be food. 2. Safety needsWith their physical needs relatively satisfied, the individual's safety needs take precedence and dominate behavior. In the absence of physical safety GÇô due to war, natural disaster, family violence, childhood abuse, etc. GÇô people may (re-)experience post-traumatic stress disorder or transgenerational trauma. In the absence of economic safety GÇô due to economic crisis and lack of work opportunities GÇô these safety needs manifest themselves in ways such as a preference for job security, grievance procedures for protecting the individual from unilateral authority, savings accounts, insurance policies, reasonable disability accommodations, etc 3. Love and belongingAfter physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third level of human needs is interpersonal and involves feelings of belongingness. The need is especially strong in childhood and can override the need for safety as witnessed in children who cling to abusive parents. Deficiencies within this level of Maslow's hierarchy GÇô due to hospitalism, neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc. GÇô can impact individual's ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships in general, such as friendship, intimacy and family 4. EsteemAll humans have a need to feel respected; this includes the need to have self-esteem and self-respect. Esteem presents the typical human desire to be accepted and valued by others. People often engage in a profession or hobby to gain recognition. 5. Self-actualizationThis level of need refers to what a person's full potential is and the realization of that potential. Maslow describes this level as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be. Being an expert on motivation theory yourself you'll know Maslow's Hierarchy of needs forms a pyramid and it is generally considered that you need to accomplish one level before you move onto the next, so I have numbered these in the order that they are. Where do you think AFK miners fit?
- Physiological needs? Mining sustains their ability to play EVE so yup, got this stage.
- Safety? With the new mining barge buffs miners have been safer then ever before. So yup.
- Love and belonging? Well there is a lot of animosity towards miners, but that doen't mean they can't have friends. On the other hand how do you make friends when you're afk? I'll give afk miners the benefit of the doubt on this one.
- Esteem? No-one respects miners, so nope don't get this stage.
- Self-Actualisation? You really think AFK mining is the upper limit of your potential as an EVE player? If so I pity you.
Interesting though, turns out afk miners are rubbish at motivational theory as well as economic theory. You need a job at CCP.
Your name would henceforth be CCP Maslow.
+1 sir. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1713
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one.
Vaerah:
I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession."
So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim:
1) Go into dungeon.
2) Fight your way to some ore.
3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore.
4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore.
Now what does this indicate?
In Skyrim:
1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity.
2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time.
3) Yield is low.
4) Mining logistics are time-consuming.
I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games.
So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online?
My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole.
I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1713
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
Oh thats easy you can find it on EVE online. Just go mine in a system where James 315 is, he's the most compelling mining content CCP have added in ages  Never not double post. I kind of thought the dessie buff/Tier 3 BCs were a bit of a better deal than bumping is, to be quite frank.
Removing the ability of GSCs to disrupt smartbombs would go a long way toward the achieving the goal we share of compelling mining content, though, I think. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1715
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sisohiv wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one. Vaerah: I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession." So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim: 1) Go into dungeon. 2) Fight your way to some ore. 3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore. 4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore. Now what does this indicate? In Skyrim: 1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity. 2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time. 3) Yield is low. 4) Mining logistics are time-consuming. I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games. So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online? My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole. I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games? The only other games I ever played where harvesting was embedded in the game was Saga of Ryzom now just called Ryzom. It was an Indi game that bankrupted. The other being Perpetuum. I've said before, if people really just wanted to Mine, harvest and manufacture, Perpetuum is a good game. Sadly it's PvP premised and none happens. So you will be making bots that will never get used. It made the same mistake EVE made. It built huge frontiers and forced everyone through exact pipes to get to them so it became a game of choke point farming. I didnt include SWG in my list because it has a unique system yet to be duplicated with the dynamic stats on static ores. I just want to be clear though, I'm interested in interesting mining content.
What would you say makes Perpetuum's mining system "interesting"? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1715
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:09:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? I'm sorry what?
I play Eve to blow people up.
The size of my wallet isn't a factor. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1716
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? I'm sorry what? I play Eve to blow people up. The size of my wallet isn't a factor. The size of CCP's wallet preservation. I mean, you have to think quite low of yourself if you play a game where the developers are so much hands-tied to profit that they willingly keep a bad mechanic bad for the sake of keeping more subs. Your mode of cogitation is practically foreign to me.
How was I supposed to pull "CCP's wallet preservation" from the original quote?
Further, the game with literally the worst mining also happens to literally have the most fun PVP, so there you go.
I'm trying to bring the rest of the game up to the caliber of the PVP as a service to those who know no different. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1716
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Your mode of cogitation is practically foreign to me.
I know, my English is self taught  . If I have to write down any lengthy concepts, they quickly turn into gibber-English. Darth Gustav wrote: Further, the game with literally the worst mining also happens to literally have the most fun PVP, so there you go.
I'm trying to bring the rest of the game up to the caliber of the PVP as a service to those who know no different.
I'd like you brought the rest of the game up to PvP standards by coming where I live and eradicating 50+ barges a day. Sadly, I am just one man. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1717
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Kale Eledar wrote:The real stupidity is that they are missing out on all the cool stuff in the game. The real stupidity is that there are some players who don't understand that not everyone shares their opinion of what is "cool". The real cool is that there are some players who don't understand that not everyone shares their opinion of what is "stupidity". He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1721
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tesal wrote:Whats the opportunity cost of playing a video game when you could be out in the real world doing real world stuff. If you're mining AFK the opportunity cost is zero.
You can play video games (Eve Online, which used to be a hard game) and court supermodels (still a hard game) at the same time. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1722
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG. You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again  AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality  . They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining. But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could. So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. I read it all in its entirety but yet all I still herd is blaaa blaa blaaa miners suck. If you want to be taken serious then post verifiable numbers from reputable sources. I donGÇÖt have any numbers of miners being profitable but I do know in hi-secI can afk ice mine on one account while running missions on the other. It seemed profitable to me. The only other example is a miner person in gameGǪGǪChibra, I think he has a few isk. The issue isn't whether or not ISK can be made now.
It's whether or not the unrestricted and umitigated access to materials devalues the profession over time.
The answer is a resounding, "Yes, it does." He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1722
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. Have not followed the entire thread. The first assumption is wrong because the "opportunity cost" is decided when you click "enter game". Time spent in game means time not spent IRL. So regardless of your activity, the OC is the same. Time out of your life, regardless. Your welcome. While ice mining AFK you can read a story to your toddler.
While ice mining AFK you can do laundry.
While ice mining AFK you can watch Firefly.
Where is the opportunity cost again?
Oh, the few minutes between logging in and getting your mining vessel in position. 
While ice mining AFK you can court a supermodel.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1733
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 04:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times.
Because of Falcon. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads.
Am I wrong? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then.
Honestly, good for them for knowing better. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then. Honestly, good for them for knowing better. They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum.. I think the hate is mostly RP. I don't hate players - any of them. Some of it is a perspective thing.
Us vs. them stuff either way. Definitely not for everybody after a 12 hour day. Then again neither would getting ganked during Hulkageddon be for everyone after a 12 hour shift.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:45:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote: They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. So let me get this straight.
You don't want to do things. Other people do.
In a game.
And you're upset because you can't ignore them...
...in the context of...
...the same exact game?
So your chief complaint is that certain people (you) don't want certain people (me) to play the game?
Or do I have you and me backward? Because I want miners to play the game. I even want them to succeed. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1743
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 09:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Ocih wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote: They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. So let me get this straight. You don't want to do things. Other people do. In a game. And you're upset because you can't ignore them... ...in the context of... ...the same exact game? So your chief complaint is that certain people (you) don't want certain people (me) to play the game? Or do I have you and me backward? Because I want miners to play the game. I even want them to succeed. You seem to have read that all wrong. I've never shot a miner in my 7 years of EVE. I feel bad if I don't kill the rats orbiting a T1 barge in a belt. Even if he does seem to be AFK. I'm looking at the vitriol here on the forums. I have no issue at all ignoring Miners. Worse case scenario for me is I can buy 60 mill Abaddons and die in a fire 10 times more than I do now. I did read it wrong. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
The vitriol isn't all entirely ill-founded, at least not in the context of the game.
There are two drastically differing player agendas at work in the sandbox.
That's the best perspective I can give you on it I guess. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1755
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:28:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe. Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~) That was exactly one of the CCP points with those new exhumers. By making them a "click once every 40 mins" affair, bots become useless. To see how important AFK mining has become, suffice to say that the AFK ices have totally tanked, while minerals (less AFK, roids deplete in few minutes) are rising. Both resources are in need at this time, both require similarly efficient setups so the only discriminator is the AFK-ness. the mineral prices are more to do with the drone nerf rather than the barge changes. That was quite a while ago now.
I think I've got to give this one to Vaerah. It's definitely divided by AFKness. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1760
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 19:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
Souisa wrote:You are not looking at the whole picture. First of all there is benefit from flooding the markets with ores and ice, because that means prices will drop. Cheaper POS'es means cheaper Tech II stuff, cheaper research and so on so forth. Cheaper ores mean cheaper ships, the the afk miner drives down prices by not being there, it will benefit him when he is. There are also people who AFK mine for their own consumption, and that should provide some healthy numbers in the books Cheaper prices mean new miners get the shaft.
Cheaper prices devalue mining as a profession.
Cheaper prices cheapen the thrill of PVP.
Cheaper prices are not the miners' friend. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
Barakach wrote:Grombutz wrote:Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"? Please list your per account income, not your total. Anyone can purchase 10,000 accounts, multi-box them then claim they make 300m/hour as if it's a great return. This does not factor the damage AFK mining does to the value of mining as a profession.
What you can earn right now is immaterial if you are clearly working toward the end goal of effortless supply.
Value = Demand / Supply.
That 300M per hour will eventually turn into 150M per hour with the same number of accounts.
Then 75M.
Then 37.5M.
Give it time and see. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
| |
|